Jordan CO2 Emissions

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive

+13%Beats the no-change baseline over 11 tests (11 tests, 6 won)

Direction

64%No clear edge over a coin flip (21 of 33 calls right in 11 tests)

Turning points

1 of 8Anticipated some turns (8 turns in 11 tests, 4 without a turn)

Error vs baseline

13% lowerError ratio 0.87; 1.00 is a tie.

Tests won

6 / 11Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.

Test period

1992-12-01 to 2024-12-013 observations ahead per test.

80% band coverage

79%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.

• Band coverage uses all stored test windows, including model-selection windows when present; it does not determine the confidence label.
• Evaluated 2026-11-15 against the cached history through 2024-12-01.
• This is an evaluation of the serving model; it does not establish a winner across four model classes.