South Korea Productivity

South Korea · Quarterly series · EC-KR-PROD

Latest, Q2 2026

117.6 pts

+0.0% from Q1 2026

Open interactive chartSouth Korea Productivity in the app

129.791.5953.5Q1 2000Q2 2027
History through Q2 2026, the forecast path to Q2 2027 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for Q2 2027: 115.7 pts, with an 80% interval of 93.3 pts to 128.1 pts.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
PeriodForecast80% low80% high
Q3 2026116.8 pts101.5 pts122.3 pts
Q4 2026116.7 pts88.4 pts129.7 pts
Q1 2027115.9 pts97.0 pts125.5 pts
Q2 2027115.7 pts93.3 pts128.1 pts

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-14.

AI confidence

Mixed evidence

The tests show no consistent, material advantage over the no-change baseline.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive
-2%Matches the no-change baseline over 8 tests (8 tests, 5 won)
Direction
53%No clear edge over a coin flip (17 of 32 calls right in 8 tests)
Turning points
7 of 10Anticipated some turns (10 turns in 8 tests, 0 without a turn)
Error vs baseline
2% higherError ratio 1.02; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won
5 / 8Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period
2018-09-01 to 2026-06-014 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage
84%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

It is above 95% of the 39 earlier readings since Q3 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)
The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
PeriodValue
Q2 2026117.6 pts
Q1 2026117.6 pts
Q4 2025118.0 pts
Q3 202597.8 pts
Q2 2025101.5 pts
Q1 2025102.7 pts
Q4 2024102.9 pts
Q3 2024107.3 pts
Q2 2024109.7 pts
Q1 2024106.0 pts
Q4 2023112.0 pts
Q3 2023107.5 pts
Q2 2023106.5 pts
Q1 2023101.9 pts
Q4 2022103.8 pts
Q3 2022106.4 pts
Q2 2022110.5 pts
Q1 2022114.0 pts
Q4 2021110.4 pts
Q3 2021108.6 pts
Q2 202199.5 pts
Q1 2021100.1 pts
Q4 2020106.5 pts
Q3 2020100.1 pts

Source

Data: public market data feeds.

More from Agentic Investor

Also stored for South Korea