Mauritius Labour Costs

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive

+32%Beats the no-change baseline over 8 tests (8 tests, 7 won)

Direction

96%Beats a coin flip (23 of 24 calls right in 8 tests)

Turning points

n/aToo few tests (2 turns, 8 needed) (2 turns in 8 tests, 6 without a turn)

Error vs baseline

32% lowerError ratio 0.68; 1.00 is a tie.

Tests won

7 / 8Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.

Test period

2002-12-01 to 2025-12-013 observations ahead per test.

80% band coverage

83%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.

• Band coverage uses all stored test windows, including model-selection windows when present; it does not determine the confidence label.
• Evaluated 2026-11-15 against the cached history through 2025-12-01.
• This is an evaluation of the serving model; it does not establish a winner across four model classes.