Namibia Gross Fixed Capital Formation

Name: Namibia Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Creator: Agentic Investor

Namibia · Annual series · EC-NA-GFCF

Latest, 2025

37.75B NAD

-8.3% from 2024

Open interactive chartNamibia Gross Fixed Capital Formation in the app

History through 2025, the forecast path to 2028 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for 2028: 36.52B NAD, with an 80% interval of -8.19B NAD to 85.63B NAD.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
Period	Forecast	80% low	80% high
2026	37.08B NAD	17.20B NAD	57.53B NAD
2027	36.66B NAD	8.51B NAD	67.88B NAD
2028	36.52B NAD	-8.19B NAD	85.63B NAD

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-15.

AI confidence

Supported evidence

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive: +16%Beats the no-change baseline over 8 tests (8 tests, 5 won)
Direction: 79%No clear edge over a coin flip (19 of 24 calls right in 8 tests)
Turning points: n/aToo few tests (6 turns, 8 needed) (6 turns in 8 tests, 1 without a turn)

Error vs baseline: 16% lowerError ratio 0.84; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won: 5 / 8Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period: 2002-12-01 to 2025-12-013 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage: 83%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.

Band coverage uses all stored test windows, including model-selection windows when present; it does not determine the confidence label.
Evaluated 2026-11-15 against the cached history through 2025-12-01.
This is an evaluation of the serving model; it does not establish a winner across four model classes.

How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

It is above 78% of the 9 earlier readings since 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)

The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
Period	Value
2025	37.75B NAD
2024	41.19B NAD
2023	43.81B NAD
2022	25.62B NAD
2021	23.31B NAD
2020	19.76B NAD
2019	24.00B NAD
2018	26.53B NAD
2017	28.22B NAD
2016	32.70B NAD
2015	45.25B NAD
2014	47.67B NAD
2013	38.82B NAD
2012	34.20B NAD
2011	26.06B NAD
2010	27.25B NAD
2009	27.58B NAD
2008	24.09B NAD
2007	20.42B NAD
2006	18.21B NAD
2005	14.03B NAD
2004	13.54B NAD
2003	12.75B NAD
2002	13.42B NAD

Source

Data: public market data feeds.