Norway Asylum Applications

Norway · Monthly series · EC-NO-AA

Latest, October 2026

225.0 pts

-21.1% from September 2026

Open interactive chartNorway Asylum Applications in the app

715357.90.8333November 2016October 2027
History through October 2026, the forecast path to October 2027 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for October 2027: 249.5 pts, with an 80% interval of 6.1 pts to 637.3 pts.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
PeriodForecast80% low80% high
November 2026193.1 pts158.1 pts234.2 pts
December 2026166.5 pts87.5 pts254.5 pts
January 2027148.9 pts59.0 pts255.8 pts
February 2027128.6 pts38.6 pts235.7 pts
March 2027130.2 pts5.7 pts284.9 pts
April 2027130.9 pts0.8 pts299.0 pts
May 2027149.5 pts36.4 pts302.6 pts
June 2027178.5 pts67.0 pts336.0 pts
July 2027207.0 pts73.1 pts411.1 pts
August 2027242.2 pts79.5 pts493.8 pts
September 2027261.9 pts60.3 pts579.8 pts
October 2027249.5 pts6.1 pts637.3 pts

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-14.

AI confidence

Supported evidence

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive
+33%Beats the no-change baseline over 12 tests (12 tests, 9 won)
Direction
74%No clear edge over a coin flip (105 of 142 calls right in 12 tests)
Turning points
18 of 51Anticipated some turns (51 turns in 12 tests, 0 without a turn)
Error vs baseline
33% lowerError ratio 0.67; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won
9 / 12Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period
2014-11-01 to 2026-10-0112 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage
84%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

It is above 46% of the 119 earlier readings since November 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)
The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
PeriodValue
October 2026225.0 pts
September 2026285.0 pts
August 2026245.0 pts
July 2026175.0 pts
June 2026195.0 pts
May 2026170.0 pts
April 2026125.0 pts
March 2026165.0 pts
February 2026200.0 pts
January 2026180.0 pts
December 2025215.0 pts
November 2025300.0 pts
October 2025345.0 pts
September 2025400.0 pts
August 2025310.0 pts
July 2025260.0 pts
June 2025265.0 pts
May 2025195.0 pts
April 2025210.0 pts
March 2025225.0 pts
February 2025265.0 pts
January 2025320.0 pts
December 2024395.0 pts
November 2024495.0 pts

Source

Data: public market data feeds.

More from Agentic Investor

Also stored for Norway