Taiwan Government Revenues
Taiwan · Annual series · EC-TW-GR
Latest, 2025
4.23T TWD
+1.0% from 2024
Forecast
Forecast for 2028: 4.33T TWD, with an 80% interval of 2.99T TWD to 5.35T TWD.
| Period | Forecast | 80% low | 80% high |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.22T TWD | 3.52T TWD | 4.56T TWD |
| 2027 | 4.27T TWD | 3.21T TWD | 4.95T TWD |
| 2028 | 4.33T TWD | 2.99T TWD | 5.35T TWD |
AI confidence
Supported evidenceThe point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.
Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)
- Accuracy vs naive
- +11%Beats the no-change baseline over 10 tests (10 tests, 8 won)
- Direction
- 77%No clear edge over a coin flip (23 of 30 calls right in 10 tests)
- Turning points
- 0 of 9Anticipated no turn, as the no-change baseline does (9 turns in 10 tests, 5 without a turn)
- Error vs baseline
- 11% lowerError ratio 0.89; 1.00 is a tie.
- Tests won
- 8 / 10Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
- Test period
- 1996-12-01 to 2025-12-013 observations ahead per test.
- 80% band coverage
- 83%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
- Band coverage uses all stored test windows, including model-selection windows when present; it does not determine the confidence label.
- Evaluated 2026-11-15 against the cached history through 2025-12-01.
- This is an evaluation of the serving model; it does not establish a winner across four model classes.
How this assessment is made
AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.
Model comparison
Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.
Reading
That is the highest of the 10 readings since 2016.
Recent history (24 observations)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.23T TWD |
| 2024 | 4.18T TWD |
| 2023 | 3.89T TWD |
| 2022 | 3.12T TWD |
| 2021 | 2.88T TWD |
| 2020 | 3.04T TWD |
| 2019 | 2.93T TWD |
| 2018 | 2.85T TWD |
| 2017 | 2.75T TWD |
| 2016 | 2.69T TWD |
| 2015 | 2.66T TWD |
| 2014 | 2.51T TWD |
| 2013 | 2.46T TWD |
| 2012 | 2.32T TWD |
| 2011 | 2.31T TWD |
| 2010 | 2.12T TWD |
| 2009 | 2.11T TWD |
| 2008 | 2.23T TWD |
| 2007 | 2.24T TWD |
| 2006 | 2.18T TWD |
| 2005 | 2.22T TWD |
| 2004 | 1.93T TWD |
| 2003 | 1.95T TWD |
| 2002 | 1.79T TWD |
Source
Data: public market data feeds.
More from Agentic Investor
- Open Taiwan Government Revenues in the app: the interactive chart and a fresh forecast
- World and commodity series: every stored series
- Vietnam indicators