Yemen Core Consumer Prices

Yemen · Monthly series · EC-YE-CCP

Latest, November 2014

179.2 pts

+0.7% from October 2014

Open interactive chartYemen Core Consumer Prices in the app

201.5132.363January 2005November 2015
History through November 2014, the forecast path to November 2015 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for November 2015: 190.2 pts, with an 80% interval of 178.5 pts to 201.3 pts.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
PeriodForecast80% low80% high
December 2014179.9 pts178.8 pts181.0 pts
January 2015180.7 pts177.8 pts184.0 pts
February 2015181.7 pts178.1 pts185.7 pts
March 2015182.7 pts177.9 pts187.6 pts
April 2015183.6 pts179.6 pts187.9 pts
May 2015184.6 pts179.5 pts189.9 pts
June 2015185.5 pts175.3 pts195.7 pts
July 2015186.4 pts174.1 pts198.5 pts
August 2015187.5 pts173.6 pts201.0 pts
September 2015188.4 pts177.2 pts199.6 pts
October 2015189.3 pts176.7 pts201.5 pts
November 2015190.2 pts178.5 pts201.3 pts

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-15.

AI confidence

Supported evidence

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive
+34%Beats the no-change baseline over 6 tests (6 tests, 4 won)
Direction
82%No clear edge over a coin flip (59 of 72 calls right in 6 tests)
Turning points
3 of 18Anticipated some turns (18 turns in 6 tests, 1 without a turn)
Error vs baseline
34% lowerError ratio 0.66; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won
4 / 6Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period
2008-12-01 to 2014-11-0112 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage
75%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

That is the highest of the 119 readings since January 2005.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)
The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
PeriodValue
November 2014179.2 pts
October 2014177.9 pts
September 2014176.3 pts
August 2014178.0 pts
July 2014175.6 pts
June 2014171.1 pts
May 2014168.3 pts
April 2014170.9 pts
March 2014170.2 pts
February 2014167.8 pts
January 2014166.6 pts
December 2013166.9 pts
November 2013165.7 pts
October 2013164.6 pts
September 2013164.2 pts
August 2013162.5 pts
July 2013161.8 pts
June 2013160.8 pts
May 2013160.1 pts
April 2013159.7 pts
March 2013158.7 pts
February 2013157.9 pts
January 2013156.3 pts
December 2012155.6 pts

Source

Data: public market data feeds.

More from Agentic Investor

Also stored for Yemen