Israel Banks Balance Sheet

Israel · Monthly series · EC-IL-BBS

Latest, August 2026

3.32T ILS

+1.2% from July 2026

Open interactive chartIsrael Banks Balance Sheet in the app

3.804T2.621T1.437TSeptember 2016August 2027
History through August 2026, the forecast path to August 2027 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for August 2027: 3.57T ILS, with an 80% interval of 3.33T ILS to 3.80T ILS.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
PeriodForecast80% low80% high
September 20263.34T ILS3.26T ILS3.43T ILS
October 20263.36T ILS3.30T ILS3.44T ILS
November 20263.38T ILS3.32T ILS3.45T ILS
December 20263.40T ILS3.24T ILS3.58T ILS
January 20273.43T ILS3.31T ILS3.56T ILS
February 20273.45T ILS3.31T ILS3.59T ILS
March 20273.46T ILS3.31T ILS3.62T ILS
April 20273.49T ILS3.27T ILS3.70T ILS
May 20273.51T ILS3.29T ILS3.72T ILS
June 20273.53T ILS3.26T ILS3.79T ILS
July 20273.55T ILS3.36T ILS3.74T ILS
August 20273.57T ILS3.33T ILS3.80T ILS

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-15.

AI confidence

Supported evidence

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive
+52%Beats the no-change baseline over 12 tests (12 tests, 12 won)
Direction
94%Beats a coin flip (136 of 144 calls right in 12 tests)
Turning points
1 of 50Anticipated some turns (50 turns in 12 tests, 0 without a turn)
Error vs baseline
52% lowerError ratio 0.48; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won
12 / 12Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period
2014-09-01 to 2026-08-0112 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage
80%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

It is above 99% of the 119 earlier readings since September 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)
The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
PeriodValue
August 20263.32T ILS
July 20263.28T ILS
June 20263.31T ILS
May 20263.39T ILS
April 20263.26T ILS
March 20263.18T ILS
February 20263.14T ILS
January 20263.11T ILS
December 20253.10T ILS
November 20253.05T ILS
October 20253.05T ILS
September 20253.01T ILS
August 20253.00T ILS
July 20252.97T ILS
June 20252.98T ILS
May 20252.91T ILS
April 20252.86T ILS
March 20252.80T ILS
February 20252.76T ILS
January 20252.77T ILS
December 20242.79T ILS
November 20242.78T ILS
October 20242.73T ILS
September 20242.72T ILS

Source

Data: public market data feeds.

More from Agentic Investor

Also stored for Israel