North Korea GDP From Utilities

Name: North Korea GDP From Utilities
Creator: Agentic Investor

North Korea · Annual series · EC-KP-GDPU

Latest, 2025

2.05T KPW

-0.4% from 2024

Open interactive chartNorth Korea GDP From Utilities in the app

History through 2025, the forecast path to 2028 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for 2028: 2.05T KPW, with an 80% interval of 1.94T KPW to 2.13T KPW.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
Period	Forecast	80% low	80% high
2026	2.05T KPW	1.95T KPW	2.12T KPW
2027	2.05T KPW	1.86T KPW	2.20T KPW
2028	2.05T KPW	1.94T KPW	2.13T KPW

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-15.

AI confidence

Limited evidence

At least 6 complete tests are required; 5 are available.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive: n/aToo few tests (5 tests, 6 needed) (5 tests, 0 won)
Direction: n/aToo few tests (5 tests, 6 needed) (2 of 15 calls right in 5 tests)
Turning points: n/aToo few tests (5 tests, 6 needed) (6 turns in 5 tests, 0 without a turn)

Error vs baseline: 16% higherError ratio 1.16; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won: 0 / 5Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period: 2011-12-01 to 2025-12-013 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage: 87%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.

Band coverage uses all stored test windows, including model-selection windows when present; it does not determine the confidence label.
Evaluated 2026-11-15 against the cached history through 2025-12-01.
This is an evaluation of the serving model; it does not establish a winner across four model classes.

How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

It is above 78% of the 9 earlier readings since 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)

The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
Period	Value
2025	2.05T KPW
2024	2.06T KPW
2023	2.04T KPW
2022	2.06T KPW
2021	2.00T KPW
2020	1.88T KPW
2019	1.85T KPW
2018	1.93T KPW
2017	1.83T KPW
2016	1.89T KPW
2015	1.54T KPW
2014	1.77T KPW
2013	1.82T KPW
2012	1.78T KPW
2011	1.75T KPW
2010	1.84T KPW
2009	1.85T KPW
2008	1.85T KPW
2007	1.75T KPW
2006	1.67T KPW
2005	1.62T KPW
2004	1.55T KPW
2003	1.48T KPW
2002	1.42T KPW

Source

Data: public market data feeds.