Lithuania Medical Doctors
Lithuania · Annual series · EC-LT-MD
Latest, 2021
4.7 pts
-0.4% from 2020
Forecast
Forecast for 2024: 4.7 pts, with an 80% interval of 4.2 pts to 5.1 pts.
| Period | Forecast | 80% low | 80% high |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4.7 pts | 4.5 pts | 4.8 pts |
| 2023 | 4.7 pts | 4.3 pts | 5.0 pts |
| 2024 | 4.7 pts | 4.2 pts | 5.1 pts |
AI confidence
Mixed evidenceThe tests show no consistent, material advantage over the no-change baseline.
Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)
- Accuracy vs naive
- +6%Matches the no-change baseline over 7 tests (7 tests, 4 won)
- Direction
- 65%No clear edge over a coin flip (13 of 20 calls right in 7 tests)
- Turning points
- n/aToo few tests (3 turns, 8 needed) (3 turns in 7 tests, 4 without a turn)
- Error vs baseline
- 6% lowerError ratio 0.94; 1.00 is a tie.
- Tests won
- 4 / 7Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
- Test period
- 2001-12-01 to 2021-12-013 observations ahead per test.
- 80% band coverage
- 95%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
- Band coverage uses all stored test windows, including model-selection windows when present; it does not determine the confidence label.
- The 80% band held more than expected outcomes; interpret its width with care.
- Evaluated 2026-11-15 against the cached history through 2021-12-01.
- This is an evaluation of the serving model; it does not establish a winner across four model classes.
How this assessment is made
AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.
Model comparison
Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.
Reading
It is above 44% of the 9 earlier readings since 2012.
Recent history (24 observations)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 4.7 pts |
| 2020 | 4.7 pts |
| 2019 | 4.8 pts |
| 2018 | 4.9 pts |
| 2017 | 4.8 pts |
| 2016 | 4.8 pts |
| 2015 | 4.6 pts |
| 2014 | 4.6 pts |
| 2013 | 4.6 pts |
| 2012 | 4.5 pts |
| 2011 | 4.4 pts |
| 2010 | 4.3 pts |
| 2009 | 4.2 pts |
| 2008 | 4.2 pts |
| 2007 | 4.2 pts |
| 2006 | 4.1 pts |
| 2005 | 4.1 pts |
| 2004 | 4.0 pts |
| 2003 | 4.0 pts |
| 2002 | 4.0 pts |
| 2001 | 4.0 pts |
| 2000 | 4.0 pts |
| 1999 | 4.1 pts |
| 1998 | 4.1 pts |
Source
Data: public market data feeds.
More from Agentic Investor
- Open Lithuania Medical Doctors in the app: the interactive chart and a fresh forecast
- World and commodity series: every stored series
- Vietnam indicators
Also stored for Lithuania
- Lithuania Asylum Applications
- Lithuania Balance Of Trade
- Lithuania Bankruptcies
- Lithuania Banks Balance Sheet
- Lithuania Building Permits
- Lithuania Business Confidence Index
- Lithuania CPI Housing Utilities
- Lithuania CPI Transportation
- Lithuania Capacity Utilization
- Lithuania Capital Flows
- Lithuania Car Registrations
- Lithuania Central Bank Balance Sheet