AgenticInvestor

Palestine Producer Prices Index YoY

Palestine · Monthly series · EC-PS-PPIYY

Latest, September 2026

-1.2%

+5.79pp from August 2026

Open interactive chartPalestine Producer Prices Index YoY in the app

138.511.77-114.9October 2016September 2027
History through September 2026, the forecast path to September 2027 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for September 2027: 2.2%, with an 80% interval of -87.7% to 104.8%.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
PeriodForecast80% low80% high
October 20262.9%-17.0%24.4%
November 20264.2%-22.8%33.9%
December 20263.2%-25.6%36.1%
January 20271.5%-49.0%61.9%
February 20270.6%-75.6%93.5%
March 20270.5%-92.4%110.3%
April 20271.1%-76.0%91.9%
May 20271.9%-110.2%132.8%
June 20272.8%-114.9%138.5%
July 20273.1%-106.3%129.3%
August 20272.9%-91.9%110.2%
September 20272.2%-87.7%104.8%

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-15.

AI confidence

Mixed evidence

The tests show no consistent, material advantage over the no-change baseline.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive
+6%Matches the no-change baseline over 8 tests (8 tests, 4 won)
Direction
65%No clear edge over a coin flip (62 of 96 calls right in 8 tests)
Turning points
17 of 33Anticipated most turns (33 turns in 8 tests, 0 without a turn)
Error vs baseline
6% lowerError ratio 0.94; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won
4 / 8Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period
2018-10-01 to 2026-09-0112 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage
79%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

It is above 24% of the 119 earlier readings since October 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)
The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
PeriodValue
September 2026-1.2%
August 2026-7.0%
July 2026-22.2%
June 2026-23.1%
May 2026-14.6%
April 202620.6%
March 202644.6%
February 202632.3%
January 202623.7%
December 202510.4%
November 20253.1%
October 202519.5%
September 202531.0%
August 202555.5%
July 202579.3%
June 202582.7%
May 202575.8%
April 202529.1%
March 20258.6%
February 20251.9%
January 202517.8%
December 202430.5%
November 202454.0%
October 202454.0%

Source

Data: public market data feeds.

More from Agentic Investor

Also stored for Palestine