Poland Productivity

Poland · Quarterly series · EC-PL-PROD

Latest, Q2 2026

138.2 pts

+0.7% from Q1 2026

Open interactive chartPoland Productivity in the app

145.697.849.99Q3 1996Q2 2027
History through Q2 2026, the forecast path to Q2 2027 (dashed) and its 80% interval (shaded).

Forecast

Forecast for Q2 2027: 141.3 pts, with an 80% interval of 135.8 pts to 145.6 pts.

Forecast path. Intervals are shown where available.
PeriodForecast80% low80% high
Q3 2026139.0 pts136.4 pts141.4 pts
Q4 2026139.7 pts136.5 pts142.7 pts
Q1 2027140.5 pts136.0 pts144.5 pts
Q2 2027141.3 pts135.8 pts145.6 pts

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model). Forecast generated 2026-11-14.

AI confidence

Supported evidence

The point forecast beat the no-change baseline overall and in a majority of the evaluated tests.

Model: Agentic Investor TSFM (foundation model)

Accuracy vs naive
+18%Beats the no-change baseline over 8 tests (8 tests, 5 won)
Direction
75%No clear edge over a coin flip (24 of 32 calls right in 8 tests)
Turning points
0 of 10Anticipated no turn, as the no-change baseline does (10 turns in 8 tests, 2 without a turn)
Error vs baseline
18% lowerError ratio 0.82; 1.00 is a tie.
Tests won
5 / 8Complete rolling backtests; ties count as no win.
Test period
2018-09-01 to 2026-06-014 observations ahead per test.
80% band coverage
84%Observed outcomes inside the band across all stored test windows.
How this assessment is made

AI confidence describes historical evidence for this forecast, not a probability of being correct. Each backtest fits on data available before its test window. The baseline carries the last value forward. Supported evidence requires at least six complete, non-overlapping tests, an error ratio below 0.90 (rounded to two decimals), and wins in a majority of tests. Ratios from 0.90 to below 1.10 are on par; 1.10 or above is weak evidence. Inconsistent wins produce mixed evidence. For a selected model, only the recent tests excluded from model selection determine this label. These are historical simulations using the available data, not a live trading track record; revisions and foundation-model pretraining can limit how closely they reproduce a past decision. Past performance can change.

Replay past tests

Model comparison

Comparison pendingA new ticker first receives its serving model's forecast and evaluation. An eligible nightly batch can compare both candidates, subject to call budgets and retry limits.

Reading

That is the highest of the 40 readings since Q3 2016.

Written from the figures by a fixed template; no AI model is involved.

Recent history (24 observations)
The 24 most recent observations, newest first.
PeriodValue
Q2 2026138.2 pts
Q1 2026137.2 pts
Q4 2025136.4 pts
Q3 2025135.1 pts
Q2 2025134.2 pts
Q1 2025133.4 pts
Q4 2024131.8 pts
Q3 2024129.4 pts
Q2 2024128.8 pts
Q1 2024126.2 pts
Q4 2023124.5 pts
Q3 2023124.7 pts
Q2 2023121.9 pts
Q1 2023121.0 pts
Q4 2022120.5 pts
Q3 2022123.6 pts
Q2 2022121.5 pts
Q1 2022123.0 pts
Q4 2021118.8 pts
Q3 2021116.8 pts
Q2 2021114.7 pts
Q1 2021115.1 pts
Q4 2020114.7 pts
Q3 2020114.6 pts

Source

Data: public market data feeds.

More from Agentic Investor

Also stored for Poland